GST Consultant in Bengaluru: Export, GCC and Cross-Border GST Guide

Published by Marcken Consulting LLP

Bengaluru is India’s largest hub for technology exports and Global Capability Centres, and its GST questions look different from most other cities. The issues that come up most often are not routine registration or returns, but the ones that arise specifically from cross-border structures: is a service genuinely an export or does it fall into the intermediary trap, how should a Global Capability Centre account for GST on costs recharged from its foreign parent, and what happens on ESOP cross-charge from an overseas holding company. If you are looking for a GST consultant in Bengaluru who understands this ecosystem, not just the compliance calendar, this guide is for you.

1. GST for a Bengaluru Technology and Export Business

Most GST advisory content is written for a domestic trading or manufacturing business. Bengaluru’s economy runs differently. A large share of the city’s registered taxpayers are IT/ITES exporters, SaaS companies, Global Capability Centres (GCCs), and consulting firms billing clients abroad in foreign currency. For these businesses, the GST questions that matter most are not the ones a generic checklist covers — they are questions of classification, cross-border supply, and refund mechanics. This guide is structured around that reality.

2. Karnataka GST Jurisdiction

Karnataka is identified in the GST framework by GST State Code 29, the first two digits of every GSTIN issued to a taxpayer registered in the state. The CGST Bengaluru Zone, headed by a Principal Chief Commissioner, exercises jurisdiction over the entire state and is headquartered at C.R. Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru 560001. The Zone has 8 Executive Commissionerates — five covering Bengaluru City (East, North, Northwest, South, and West, divided primarily by PIN code), plus Mysuru, Belagavi, and Mangalore — along with 4 Audit Commissionerates and 4 Appeals Commissionerates. Outside Bengaluru City, jurisdiction follows municipal wards and taluks as notified under Trade Notice No. 01/2017-CT, effective 22 June 2017.

For state-level administration, the Karnataka Commercial Taxes Department functions as the SGST authority, with the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes based in Bengaluru. A business operating in Bengaluru will generally deal with the CGST Bengaluru East, North, Northwest, South, or West Commissionerate depending on registered address, and with the corresponding Karnataka SGST circle for state-tax matters.

3. GST on IT/ITES and SaaS Exports

Export of services is the single most consequential GST issue for Bengaluru’s technology sector, and it is also the one most frequently got wrong. Under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017, a supply qualifies as an “export of services” only if all five conditions are met: the supplier is located in India, the recipient is located outside India, the place of supply is outside India, payment is received in convertible foreign exchange (or permitted INR through a Special Vostro Account), and the supplier and recipient are not merely establishments of a distinct person. Where all five conditions are satisfied, the supply is zero-rated under Section 16 of the IGST Act.

3.1 LUT Route vs IGST-and-Refund Route

Exporters have two compliance routes. The first is to export under a Letter of Undertaking (LUT), filed in Form GST RFD-11 under Rule 96A of the CGST Rules before the start of each financial year, allowing supply without payment of IGST. The second is to pay IGST on the export invoice and subsequently claim a refund of that tax under Rule 96. In practice, most Bengaluru service exporters prefer the LUT route: it avoids a cash outflow at invoice stage, and any accumulated, unutilised input tax credit is instead claimed as a refund under Section 54 of the CGST Act read with Rule 89.

• LUT filing window: The LUT must be on file before export begins in a financial year and should be renewed early — waiting until the first export invoice of the year creates avoidable compliance risk.
• Refund time limit: A refund claim under Section 54 must be filed within 2 years from the “relevant date” — for export of services, this is generally the date of receipt of foreign currency, evidenced by a Bank Realisation Certificate (BRC) or Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate (FIRC).
• Provisional sanction: Under Section 54(6), 90 percent of the refund claimed is required to be sanctioned provisionally within 7 days of acknowledgment of a complete application, with the balance following after verification.

3.2 The Intermediary Trap — and a Major 2026 Change

The definition of “intermediary” itself is unchanged — Section 2(13) of the IGST Act defines it as a broker, agent, or person who arranges or facilitates the supply of goods or services between two or more persons, but excludes anyone supplying such goods or services on their own account. CBIC Circular No. 159/15/2021-GST dated 20 September 2021 continues to guide this distinction: an intermediary relationship requires a minimum of three parties and two distinct supplies, with the intermediary not being the principal supplier of the main service. This distinction still matters after the 2026 amendment — a company that classifies incorrectly as an intermediary when it is not (or vice versa) still faces classification risk, even though the commercial cost of misclassification has fallen.

For a Bengaluru SaaS company building and licensing its own software to an overseas customer, this issue rarely arises — it supplies its own service on its own account. It is most relevant for IT/ITES back-office units, GCCs performing facilitation functions, marketing support entities acting on behalf of a foreign principal, and consulting firms structured as agents rather than principals. Contracts and service descriptions should be reviewed to ensure the underlying commercial arrangement — and not merely the invoice wording — supports the classification claimed.

4. GST for Global Capability Centres (GCCs) in Bengaluru

Bengaluru is India’s largest Global Capability Centre hub. Industry estimates place the city’s share at roughly a quarter of all Indian GCCs by count and closer to a third of GCC-employed talent, spanning technology, engineering, financial services, and enterprise functions. GCCs raise GST questions that a typical exporter does not face, because the Indian entity is usually a captive unit of a foreign parent rather than an independent business transacting at arm’s length with unrelated overseas customers.

4.1 Cost Recharge and Cross-Charge From the Foreign Parent

Where a foreign parent recharges the Bengaluru GCC for shared services, software licences, or centrally procured support, this is generally treated as an import of service. Under Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, IGST is payable under reverse charge, with valuation typically following the invoice value as open market value where the recipient is entitled to full input tax credit. This is distinct from cross-charge between two GST registrations of the same Indian legal entity — the more familiar domestic head-office-to-branch scenario — which the Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling addressed directly in the Columbia Asia Hospitals case, holding that a company’s India Management Office providing accounting and administrative support to its other GST registrations makes a taxable supply under Schedule I, including an allocation of employee salary cost. CBIC Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST dated 17 July 2023 later clarified the position nationally, including that use of the Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism, rather than direct cross-charge, is one route for distributing credit on common input services.

4.2 Secondment of Expatriate Employees

A recurring GST issue for Bengaluru GCCs is the secondment of employees from a foreign group entity — a fact pattern the Supreme Court examined directly in C.C., C.E. & S.T., Bangalore v. Northern Operating Systems Pvt. Ltd., holding on those specific facts that the arrangement constituted a taxable manpower supply service liable to reverse charge, given that the foreign entity retained elements of control and charged a mark-up on cost recovery. The Court was explicit that its ruling turned on the facts before it and was not intended as a universal precedent. Subsequent rulings — including the Karnataka High Court’s 2025 decision in Alstom Transport India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, on facts closer to a genuine employer-employee relationship — have reached different conclusions, and in December 2023 the CBIC instructed field authorities to assess secondment cases individually rather than applying Northern Operating Systems mechanically, and to avoid invoking the extended limitation period under Section 74 absent clear evidence of fraud or wilful suppression.

Because outcomes turn closely on the specific secondment agreement, payroll structure, and degree of control, Bengaluru GCCs with expatriate or seconded staff should have their secondment documentation reviewed on its own facts rather than assuming either full exposure or full exemption.

5. GST on ESOP Cross-Charge From an Overseas Parent

Many Bengaluru startups and GCCs operate under an ESOP or RSU scheme administered by a foreign parent or holding company, with the cost of shares issued to Indian employees subsequently recharged to the Indian subsidiary. Whether this recharge attracts GST is a live and unsettled question, distinct from the income-tax perquisite treatment on exercise. Tax authorities have in some cases sought to treat the cross-charge as consideration for a service — the parent facilitating an employee incentive on behalf of the subsidiary — and demanded IGST under reverse charge on the recharged amount, while taxpayers have argued that the underlying transaction is an issue of the parent’s own equity shares, which is excluded from the definition of goods or services and falls outside the scope of GST altogether.

For a Bengaluru company with an ESOP scheme structured through a foreign parent, the safer practice is to review the recharge agreement specifically — whether it is described as a reimbursement of the cost of equity instruments or as a fee for a facilitation service — since that characterisation materially affects the GST position. This is a separate question from the income-tax and Companies Act valuation requirements on ESOP exercise; readers setting up or reviewing an ESOP scheme in Bengaluru may also find our dedicated guide relevant: ESOP Consultant in Bengaluru.

Marcken Consulting’s GST advisory work for Bengaluru clients is coordinated with the firm’s valuation and ESOP practice, so that cross-border structuring questions — export classification, GCC cost recharge, and ESOP cross-charge alike — are addressed with a consistent view across GST, income tax, and Companies Act requirements, rather than in isolation. For a broader view of the firm’s GST Advisory Services, see our services page.

6. GST Registration, Returns, and Input Tax Credit

Alongside the export- and GCC-specific issues above, every Bengaluru business must still meet the standard registration, filing, and credit compliance requirements. This section is intentionally condensed, since it does not differ from the requirements applicable across India.

6.1 Registration

• Compulsory registration thresholds under Section 22 are Rs 40 lakh for suppliers of goods and Rs 20 lakh for suppliers of services (Karnataka being a normal-category state); certain categories of persons must register irrespective of turnover under Section 24, including those making inter-state taxable supplies and persons liable to pay tax under reverse charge.
• The Composition Scheme under Section 10 (and Section 10(2A) for service providers) is available up to Rs 1.5 crore turnover for goods and Rs 50 lakh for services, though it is rarely suitable for export-oriented businesses since composition dealers cannot make zero-rated supplies or claim ITC refunds.
• Multiple GST registrations within Karnataka for distinct business verticals, or an additional place of business for a GCC’s second campus or delivery centre, require separate documentation and are common in Bengaluru’s multi-site technology parks. New registrations and amendments are filed on the GST registration portal.

6.2 Returns and Reconciliation

• Monthly or quarterly GSTR-1 (outward supplies), GSTR-3B (summary return and payment), and the QRMP scheme for eligible small taxpayers.
• Annual return GSTR-9 and, where applicable, the reconciliation statement GSTR-9C.
• ITC reconciliation against GSTR-2B, and for export-oriented businesses, month-on-month reconciliation of GSTR-1 Table 6A export data against the BRC/FIRC register to keep refund claims audit-ready.
• Section 17(5) continues to block credit on specified categories — for example, motor vehicles (subject to exceptions), certain employee benefit expenses, and works contract services for immovable property (subject to exceptions) — a recurring point of friction for GCCs with large office campuses and employee welfare spends.

7. GST Notices, Audits, and Appeals

Export-oriented and GCC businesses in Bengaluru are more likely than most to face scrutiny specifically on refund claims and cross-border classification, in addition to the standard notice and audit framework.

• Scrutiny and demand: Discrepancy intimation in Form ASMT-10, followed where unresolved by pre-show-cause intimation in DRC-01A and a formal show cause notice in DRC-01, culminating in an order under DRC-07.
• Refund-specific scrutiny: A deficiency memo in RFD-03 or a show cause notice in RFD-08 where the department disputes the export classification, LUT validity, or ITC eligibility underlying a refund claim.
• Departmental audit: Under Section 65, a general audit conducted with 15 days’ prior notice, ordinarily to be completed within 3 months (extendable by a further 6 months for reasons recorded in writing).
• Special audit: Under Section 66, ordered where the case is complex or revenue interest so requires, conducted by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant, within 90 days (extendable by a further 90 days).
• Appeals: A first appeal under Section 107 lies to the Appellate Authority within 3 months of the order, with a 10 percent pre-deposit of the disputed tax; a second appeal lies to the GST Appellate Tribunal under Section 112.

For a broader treatment of the notice and appeals process, see our guide: GST on Cross-Border Services: Place of Supply Rules Every Exporter Should Know.

8. What to Look for in a GST Consultant in Bengaluru

Bengaluru’s GST landscape is unusually concentrated in export and cross-border issues relative to most Indian cities. When evaluating a GST consultant in Bengaluru, the questions worth asking are specific to that context:

• Does the consultant have direct experience with export refund claims under Section 54 and Rule 89 — not just LUT filing, but the follow-through to refund sanction?
• Can they assess whether a specific service arrangement risks intermediary classification, and structure or document it accordingly?
• Do they understand the distinction between domestic cross-charge (Schedule I, ISD mechanism) and cross-border cost recharge (import of service, reverse charge) — a distinction GCCs frequently need addressed together?
• Are they current on recent legislative change — the 2026 omission of Section 13(8)(b) is a recent enough development that not every practitioner will have updated their advice to reflect it?

This guide has intentionally avoided ranking claims or unverifiable superlatives; the questions above are offered so a business can evaluate any consultant, including Marcken Consulting, on the same basis.

9. Frequently Asked Questions — GST Consultant in Bengaluru

Q1. Is a Bengaluru IT company’s export of services automatically zero-rated?

No. Zero-rating under Section 16 of the IGST Act is available only where the supply meets all five conditions of “export of services” under Section 2(6) — Indian supplier, overseas recipient, place of supply outside India, payment in convertible foreign exchange, and supplier and recipient not being establishments of a distinct person. A company that is classified as an “intermediary” or fails any of these conditions does not automatically qualify, even where the client is genuinely overseas and payment is in foreign currency.

Q2. How does the 2026 change to Section 13(8)(b) affect an existing IT/ITES company in Bengaluru?

If the company was previously denied export status because it was classified as an intermediary, transactions from 30 March 2026 onward may now qualify as zero-rated exports, provided the Section 2(6) conditions are otherwise met. This does not apply retrospectively to invoices raised before that date. Companies should also review any services they procure from foreign intermediaries, since these may now attract reverse charge IGST as an import of service.

Q3. Does a Bengaluru GCC need to pay GST on costs recharged by its foreign parent?

Generally yes, under the reverse charge mechanism, since this is treated as an import of service. The GST liability and available input tax credit depend on the nature of the recharge, the valuation method used, and whether the GCC has full ITC entitlement. Recharges should be documented and valued in a manner consistent with Rule 28 of the CGST Rules.

Q4. Is secondment of expatriate staff to a Bengaluru GCC always subject to GST?

No. Outcomes depend heavily on the specific facts — payroll arrangement, degree of control, and whether the foreign entity charges a mark-up on cost recovery. The Supreme Court’s Northern Operating Systems ruling was explicitly limited to its own facts, later decisions have reached different conclusions on different facts, and CBIC has directed field authorities to assess each case individually rather than applying a blanket rule.

Q5. What is the time limit for claiming a GST refund on export of services?

2 years from the “relevant date” under Section 54 of the CGST Act — for export of services, this is generally the date of receipt of foreign currency as evidenced by a BRC or FIRC. Refund claims should ideally be filed month-on-month or quarter-on-quarter rather than close to the deadline, to protect working capital and reduce documentation risk.

Q6. Does GST apply to the recharge of ESOP costs from a foreign parent to a Bengaluru subsidiary?

This is an unsettled area. Some tax authorities have sought to treat the recharge as consideration for a facilitation service, attracting IGST under reverse charge, while taxpayers have argued the underlying transaction is an issue of the parent’s own shares and falls outside the scope of GST. The characterisation in the specific recharge agreement is central to the analysis, and businesses with such arrangements should have the agreement reviewed rather than assuming a default position.

10. Get in Touch

Whether you are a founder setting up GST compliance for a new Bengaluru entity, a CFO of a Global Capability Centre reviewing cross-charge exposure, or a finance team preparing an export refund claim, Marcken Consulting — your GST consultant in Bengaluru — is available to assist. GST compliance is one part of a broader finance function; readers building out that function may also find our guide to Virtual CFO Services in Bengaluru relevant. A no-charge 30-minute consultation is available to discuss your specific position.

Reach out to us at: marckenconsulting.com
Marcken Consulting LLP — IBBI-Registered Valuer (Securities or Financial Assets)
Phone: +91 99980 59923 / +91 99985 39902
Email: crm@marckenconsulting.com

---

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. Readers are advised to consult a qualified professional before acting on any information contained herein. Regulations referred to above are subject to amendment; please verify the current position at the time of acting. Published July 2026.